Queensland was the first Australian State to initiate  women  serving on juries. The relevant bill was passed in 1924, although those interested  had to formally indicate their desire to participate and  were not actively encouraged to do so.

However, in 1942 an appeal went out in Brisbane for women to put their names forward. With so many men serving  in WWII it was becoming difficult to find enough jurors to cover Supreme Court cases. One woman who rallied to the cause was housewife Nellie Bishop of  Monro Street, Kelvin Grove. She admitted later that she had registered ‘in a weak moment’, although she did believe in women  playing their part in the judicial system.

As time went by  Mrs Bishop forgot the whole thing.  She had a son in the AIF, and  was  busy in her role of Secretary of the  Women’s Auxillary at her local Returned Servicemen’s League,

It was not until March 1945 that the call came.

Nellie Bishop

Nellie Bishop

When  Mr Dendle, the Supreme Court Bailiff, knocked on the door and served a summons on her, Nellie thought he was from Manpower. She imagined being sent off to drive a truck or produce ammunition. She sharply told him that she was too old, and couldn’t be sent anywhere.  Even when she realized who Dendle was, she tried to convince him that it would be her husband, he was after, not her.

Supreme Court Brisbane

Supreme Court Building, Brisbane.

Anyway, off she went in her best hat.  It was the first time she had ever been in a courtroom and she was very nervous. It hadn’t occurred to her that she would be  the only woman among 45 prospective male jurors. When the baliff  mistakenly called our ‘Mr Bishop?’, she didn’t respond, more from nerves and confusion than irritation.

The first case on the agenda was that of  46 year old  George Ebbage, a taxi driver  charged with stealing cigarettes and bedsheets from the American Red Cross.

To her shock, Nellie she was not challenged either by the defence or  prosecution lawyers.  Dan Casey, the defence lawyer, was the first in Brisbane not to challenge a female juror, such was the prejudice of the day.

And thus it was that Nellie  took her place with several other  male jurers to decide Mr  Ebbage’s fate.  He testified that he took three American sailors to a Brisbane hotel late on the night in question and found the cigarettes and sheets in the boot of his taxi next morning. On the theory of ‘finders keepers’ he said he put the goods under his house in a tea chest.

However, his story was judged  totally implausible and he was ‘sent down’. Mrs Bishop said she found finding someone guilty very upsetting. When she told her husband about the experience he grinned and said, ‘Serves you right!’

The next two trials on the list were murder trials and Nellie was so horrified at the prospect that  after she was challenged she collapsed in her seat with relief. She said later that capital cases were too much responsibility for her. She was beginning to wonder whether blithely  putting her name forward had been the right thing to do. However, she did still think that women should have a place on juries when  women were involved.

Following her collapse she was excused from further appearance for the rest of the Supreme Court sittings. Nevertheless, her place in Queensland history was assured. She went home, took her hat off and made a cup of tea.

Nellie Bishop

In due course,  notification of the Jury Fee arrived  from the Sherriff’s Office. Not nearly as much as the men received of course. The rate was nine shillings and one penny per day for women, sixteen shillings and two pennies for men.

Jury Service Fee

Not quite equal pay.

The kindly Mrs Bishop said she would donate her fee to a fund for discharged prisoners. For a shy, retiring person the attention she received  in the press was almost as stressful as her courtroom experience. Letters of congratulations arrived at Monro Street, including one from the Women’s Christian Temperance Union.

Nellie was definitely not of the same ilk as the dedicated  activists within the Temperance Movement, but I would have been happy for her to sit in judgement on me.

  1. What an interesting story! Great post, Pauline.

Leave a Reply

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.